ABSTRACT
Introducción: El tabaquismo puede tener un papel importante en la infección por SARS-CoV-2 y en el curso de la enfermedad. Los estudios previos muestran resultados contradictorios o no concluyentes sobre la prevalencia de fumar y la severidad en la enfermedad por coronavirus (COVID-19). Material y métodos: Estudio de cohortes observacional, multicéntrico y retrospectivo de 14.260 pacientes que ingresaron por COVID-19 en hospitales españoles desde febrero a septiembre de 2020. Se registraron sus características clínicas y se clasificaron en el grupo con tabaquismo si tabaquismo activo o previo o en el grupo sin tabaquismo si nunca habían fumado. Se realizó un seguimiento hasta un mes después del alta. Se analizaron las diferencias entre grupos. La relación entre tabaquismo y mortalidad intrahospitalaria se valoró mediante una regresión logística multivariante y curvas de Kapplan Meier. Resultados: La mediana de edad fue 68,6 (55,8-79,1) años, con un 57,7% de varones. El grupo con tabaquismo presentó mayor edad (69,9 (59,6-78,0 años)), predominio masculino (80,3%) y mayor índice de Charlson (4 (2-6)). La evolución fue peor en estos pacientes, con una mayor tasa de ingreso en UCI (10,4 vs 8,1%), mayor mortalidad intrahospitalaria (22,5 vs 16,4%) y reingreso al mes (5,8 vs 4,0%) que el grupo sin tabaquismo. Tras el análisis multivariante, el tabaquismo permanecía asociado a estos eventos. Conclusiones: El tabaquismo de forma activa o pasada es un factor predictor independiente de mal pronóstico en los pacientes con COVID-19, estando asociada a mayor probabilidad de ingreso en UCI y a mayor mortalidad intrahospitalaria.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Age is a risk factor for COVID severity. Most studies performed in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV2 infection have shown an over-representation of older patients and consequently few have properly defined COVID-19 in younger patients who require hospital admission. The aim of the present study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and risk factors for the development of respiratory failure among young (18 to 50 years) hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective nationwide cohort study included hospitalized patients from 18 to 50 years old with confirmed COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and July 2, 2020. All patient data were obtained from the SEMI-COVID Registry. Respiratory failure was defined as the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) ≤200 mmHg or the need for mechanical ventilation and/or high-flow nasal cannula or the presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome. RESULTS: During the recruitment period, 15,034 patients were included in the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, of whom 2327 (15.4%) were younger than 50 years. Respiratory failure developed in 343 (14.7%), while mortality occurred in 2.3%. Patients with respiratory failure showed a higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (44 (13%) vs 14 (0.8%), p<0.001), venous thrombosis (23 (6.7%) vs 14 (0.8%), p<0.001), mortality (43 (12.5%) vs 7 (0.4%), p<0.001), and longer hospital stay (15 (9-24) vs 6 (4-9), p<0.001), than the remaining patients. In multivariate analysis, variables associated with the development of respiratory failure were obesity (odds ratio (OR), 2.42; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.71 to 3.43; p<0.0001), alcohol abuse (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.26 to 4.58; p=0.0076), sleep apnea syndrome (SAHS) (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.43; p=0.032), Charlson index ≥1 (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.25 to 2.52; p=0.0013), fever (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.22; p=0.0075), lymphocytes ≤1100 cells/µL (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.37; p=0.0033), LDH >320 U/I (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.42; p=0.0039), AST >35 mg/dL (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.52; p=0.003), sodium <135 mmol/L (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.24 to 4.33; p=0.0079), and C-reactive protein >8 mg/dL (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.72 to 3.41; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Young patients with COVID-19 requiring hospital admission showed a notable incidence of respiratory failure. Obesity, SAHS, alcohol abuse, and certain laboratory parameters were independently associated with the development of this complication. Patients who suffered respiratory failure had a higher mortality and a higher incidence of major cardiac events, venous thrombosis, and hospital stay.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Insufficiency , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Hospitals , Humans , Middle Aged , RNA, Viral , Registries , Respiratory Insufficiency/epidemiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Whether immunosuppressed (IS) patients have a worse prognosis of COVID-19 compared to non-IS patients is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcome of IS patients hospitalized with COVID-19 compared to non-IS patients. METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study. We included all patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, a large multicentre national cohort in Spain, from March 27th until June 19th, 2020. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of in-hospital death among IS compared to non-IS patients. RESULTS: Among 13 206 included patients, 2 111 (16.0%) were IS. A total of 166 (1.3%) patients had solid organ (SO) transplant, 1081 (8.2%) had SO neoplasia, 332 (2.5%) had hematologic neoplasia, and 570 (4.3%), 183 (1.4%) and 394 (3.0%) were receiving systemic steroids, biological treatments, and immunosuppressors, respectively. Compared to non-IS patients, the aOR (95% CI) for in-hospital death was 1.60 (1.43-1.79) for all IS patients, 1.39 (1.18-1.63) for patients with SO cancer, 2.31 (1.76-3.03) for patients with haematological cancer and 3.12 (2.23-4.36) for patients with SO transplant. The aOR (95% CI) for death for patients who were receiving systemic steroids, biological treatments and immunosuppressors compared to non-IS patients were 2.16 (1.80-2.61), 1.97 (1.33-2.91) and 2.06 (1.64-2.60), respectively. IS patients had a higher odds than non-IS patients of in-hospital acute respiratory distress syndrome, heart failure, myocarditis, thromboembolic disease and multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: IS patients hospitalized with COVID-19 have a higher odds of in-hospital complications and death compared to non-IS patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/pathology , Hospital Mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/virology , Cohort Studies , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hospitalization , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/complications , Odds Ratio , Registries , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SpainABSTRACT
BackgroundThe use of ACEI (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor) and ARB (Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker) in COVID-19 remains controversial. Our main aim was to describe the effect of ACEI/ARB treatment during COVID-19 hospitalization on mortality and complications. MethodsRetrospective, observational, multicenter study, part of the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, comparing patients with COVID-19 treated with ACEI/ARB during hospitalization to those not treated. The primary endpoint was incidence of the composite outcome of prognosis (IMV [Invasive Mechanical Ventilation], NIMV [Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation], ICU admission [Intensive Care Unit], and/or all-cause mortality). The secondary endpoint was incidence of MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events). We evaluated both outcomes in patients whose treatment with ACEI/ARB continued or was withdrawn during hospitalization. ResultsBetween February and June 2020, 11,205 patients were included, with mean age 67 years (SD=16.3) and 43.1% female; 2,162 patients received ACEI/ARB treatment. ACEI/ARB treatment showed a protective effect on all-cause mortality (p<.0001). In hypertensive patients it was also protective in terms of IMV, ICU admission, and the composite outcome of prognosis (p<.0001 for all). No differences were found in incidence of MACE. Patients previously treated with ACEI/ARB who continued treatment during hospitalization had a lower incidence of the composite outcome of prognosis than those whose treatment was withdrawn (RR 0.67, 95%CI 0.63-0.76). ARB had a more beneficial effect on survival than ACEI (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.62-0.96). ConclusionACEI/ARB treatment during COVID-19 hospitalization had a protective effect on mortality. The benefits were greater in hypertensive patients, those who continued treatment during hospitalization, and those taking ARB. SummaryTreatment with ACEI/ARB during COVID-19 hospitalization showed a beneficial effect on mortality in the general population. The benefit was greater in hypertensive patients, in those who maintained treatment during hospitalization and those taking ARB.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background: Since December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the concept of medicine. This work aims to analyze the use of antibiotics in patients admitted to the hospital due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This work analyzes the use and effectiveness of antibiotics in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 based on data from the SEMI-COVID-19 registry, an initiative to generate knowledge about this disease using data from electronic medical records. Our primary endpoint was all-cause in-hospital mortality according to antibiotic use. The secondary endpoint was the effect of macrolides on mortality. Results: Of 13,932 patients, antibiotics were used in 12,238. The overall death rate was 20.7% and higher among those taking antibiotics (87.8%). Higher mortality was observed with use of all antibiotics (OR 1.40, 95%CI 1.21-1.62; p<.001) except macrolides, which had a higher survival rate (OR 0.70, 95%CI 0.64-0.76; p<.001). The decision to start antibiotics was influenced by presence of increased inflammatory markers and any kind of infiltrate on an x-ray. Patients receiving antibiotics required respiratory support and were transferred to intensive care units more often. Conclusions: Bacterial co-infection was uncommon among COVID-19 patients, yet use of antibiotics was high. There is insufficient evidence to support widespread use of empiric antibiotics in these patients. Most may not require empiric treatment and if they do, there is promising evidence regarding azithromycin as a potential COVID-19 treatment.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , CoinfectionABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a prediction model, based on clinical history and examination findings on initial diagnosis of COVID-19, to identify patients at risk of critical outcomes. DESIGN National multicenter cohort study. SETTING Data from the SEMI (Sociedad Espanola de Medicina Interna) COVID-19 Registry, a nationwide cohort of consecutive COVID-19 patients presenting in 132 centers between March 23 and May 21, 2020. Model development used data from hospitals with >300 beds, and validation used those from hospitals with <300 beds. PARTICIPANTS Adults (age [≥] 18 years) presenting with COVID-19 diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Composite of in-hospital death, mechanical ventilation or admission to intensive care unit. RESULTS There were 10,433 patients, 7,850 (main outcome rate 25.1%) in the model development cohort and 2,583 (main outcome rate 27.0%) in the validation cohort. The clinical variables in the final model were: age, cardiovascular disease, moderate or severe chronic kidney disease, dyspnea, tachypnea, confusion, systolic blood pressure, and SpO2 [≤] 93% or supplementary oxygen requirement at presentation. The model developed had C-statistic of 0.823 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.813 to 0.834) and calibration slope of 0.995. The external validation had C-statistic of 0.792 (95% CI, 0.772 to 0.812) and calibration slope of 0.872. The model showed positive net benefit in terms of hospitalizations avoided for the predicted probability thresholds between 3% and 79%. CONCLUSIONS Among patients presenting with COVID-19, easily-obtained basic clinical information had good discrimination for identifying patients at risk of critical outcomes, and the model showed good generalizability. A model-based online prediction calculator provided with this paper would facilitate triage of patients during the pandemic.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Tachypnea , Dyspnea , COVID-19 , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , ConfusionABSTRACT
ObjectivesA decrease in blood cell counts, especially lymphocytes and eosinophils, has been described in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), but there is no knowledge of the potential role of their recovery in these patients prognosis. This article aims to analyse the effect of blood cell depletion and blood cell recovery on mortality due to COVID-19. DesignThis work is a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study of 9,644 hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19 from the Spanish Society of Internal Medicines SEMI-COVID-19 Registry. SettingThis study examined patients hospitalised in 147 hospitals throughout Spain. ParticipantsThis work analysed 9,644 patients (57.12% male) out of a cohort of 12,826 patients [≥]18 years of age hospitalised with COVID-19 in Spain included in the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry as of 29 May 2020. Main outcome measuresThe main outcome measure of this work is the effect of blood cell depletion and blood cell recovery on mortality due to COVID-19. Univariate analysis was performed to determine possible predictors of death and then multivariate analysis was carried out to control for potential confounders. ResultsAn increase in the eosinophil count on the seventh day of hospitalisation was associated with a better prognosis, including lower mortality rates (5.2% vs 22.6% in non-recoverers, OR 0.234 [95% CI, 0.154 to 0.354]) and lower complication rates, especially regarding to development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (8% vs 20.1%, p=0.000) and ICU admission (5.4% vs 10.8%, p=0.000). Lymphocyte recovery was found to have no effect on prognosis. Treatment with inhaled or systemic glucocorticoids was not found to be a confounding factor. ConclusionEosinophil recovery in patients with COVID-19 is a reliable marker of a good prognosis that is independent of prior treatment. This finding could be used to guide discharge decisions.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background. Spain has been one of the countries most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective. To create a registry of patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in Spain in order to improve our knowledge of the clinical, diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic aspects of this disease. Methods. A multicentre retrospective cohort study, including consecutive patients hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 throughout Spain. Epidemiological and clinical data, additional tests at admission and at seven days, treatments administered, and progress at 30 days of hospitalization were collected from electronic medical records. Results. Up to April 30th 2020, 6,424 patients from 109 hospitals were included. Their median age was 69.1 years (range: 18-102 years) and 56.9% were male. Prevalences of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus were 50.2%, 39.7%, and 18.7%, respectively. The most frequent symptoms were fever (86.2%) and cough (76.5%). High values of ferritin (72.4%), lactate dehydrogenase (70.2%), and D-dimer (61.5%), as well as lymphopenia (52.6%), were frequent. The most used antiviral drugs were hydroxychloroquine (85.7%) and lopinavir/ritonavir (62.4%). 31.5% developed respiratory distress. Overall mortality rate was 21.1%, with a marked increase with age (50-59 years: 4.2%, 60-69 years: 9.1%, 70-79 years: 21.4%, 80-89 years: 42.5%, [≥] 90 years: 51.1%). Conclusions. The SEMI-COVID-19 Network provides data on the clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in Spain. Patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in Spain are mostly severe cases, as one in three patients developed respiratory distress and one in five patients died. These findings confirm a close relationship between advanced age and mortality.
Subject(s)
Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Fever , Diabetes Mellitus , Dyslipidemias , Hypertension , COVID-19 , LymphopeniaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Since the confirmation of the first patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Spain in January 2020, the epidemic has grown rapidly, with the greatest impact on the Madrid region. This article describes the first 2226 consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the La Paz University Hospital in Madrid. METHODS Our cohort included all consecutively admitted patients who were hospitalized and who had a final outcome (death or discharge) in a 1286-bed hospital of Madrid (Spain) from February 25th (first case admitted) to April 19th, 2020. Data was entered manually into an electronic case report form, which was monitored prior to the analysis. RESULTS We consecutively included 2226 adult patients admitted to the hospital who either died (460) or were discharged (1766). The patients median age was 61 years; 51.8% were women. The most common comorbidity was arterial hypertension (41.3%). The most common symptoms on admission were fever (71.2%). The median time from disease onset to hospital admission was 6 days. Overall mortality was 20.7% and was higher in men (26.6% vs 15.1%). Seventy-five patients with a final outcome were transferred to the ICU (3.4%). Most patients admitted to the ICU were men, and the median age was 64 years. Baseline laboratory values on admission were consistent with an impaired immune-inflammatory profile. CONCLUSIONS We provide a description of the first large cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Europe. Advanced age, male gender, the presence of comorbidities and abnormal laboratory values were more common among the patients with fatal outcomes.